Use of Technology in Umpiring

Interesting debate taking place on cricinfo.com about the use of technology in umpiring. The experiment during the recent World Series had mixed but very vocal repsonses. I feel if the technology is there we should use it. But the question is, is that technology good enough? Whats the use of technology if it takes 5 minutes to decide whether a catch was taken cleanly or not. Also there should be some validation of the Hawk-eye science. If its good enough (and sure enough) I guess its only fair to use it. Even though it will leave us less things to talk about :-)
But then this helps me wonder why doesnt the MLB in US use that kinda stuff? They still have the human umpires out in the field altho I think baseball umpiring is much tougher due to the speed of the ball/game. I guess the crowd loves the anticipation when the umpire calls "safe!".




